Who should we have listened to? (Election edition)

In one corner, you have a well-respected and non-partisan “scientific” pollster in Nate Silver at the five-thirty-eight blog. Despite the statistical analyses he uses, Silver has been continuously accused of partisanship (his blog is supported by the NYTimes!) by conservatives, who of all things, attack his polling techniques in favor of their own predictions based on “experience” and “gut”. Well, gee – what happened (as of 12:30 a.m.)?

[290 electoral votes projected for Obama, and a Presidential victory.] So in many ways, the victory for President Obama has been a victory for the scientific method.


[Edit: Here’s a perfect one from Peggy Noonan.]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: